Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

QQQI vs VIG

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF versus Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

VIG wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but QQQI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

VIG wins this comparison 4–0 across 6 dimensions. VIG yields 1.48% — higher than QQQI's 0.09% — and carries a 7.2/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 6.9/10 for QQQI (Solid). VIG wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but QQQI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, VIG generates 1.48% vs 0.09% — a 1.39% difference that translates to $1,390 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	QQQI	VIG	Winner
Yield	0.09%	1.48%	VIG wins
Dividend safety	6.9/10	7.2/10	Tie
Growth trend	—	—	Tie
Expense ratio	68.00%	4.00%	VIG wins
Scale	$14.3B	$132.4B	VIG wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Qualified-eligible	VIG wins
Overall	0 wins	4 wins	VIG wins

Dimension by dimension

VIG wins on yield (1.48% vs 0.09%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $139 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

VIG's higher yield (1.48%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus QQQI's 0.09% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

QQQI: 0.09%VIG: 1.48%

Safety scores are too close to call (6.9/10 vs 7.2/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

QQQI: 6.9/10VIG: 7.2/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

QQQI: —VIG: —

VIG is cheaper (4.00% vs 68.00%)

On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $6400/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.

On $10,000 invested, VIG's lower expense ratio saves roughly $64/year in fees versus QQQI. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.

QQQI: 68.00%VIG: 4.00%

VIG is 9.3× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

QQQI: $14.3BVIG: $132.4B

VIG is more tax-efficient in a taxable account

QQQI's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from VIG which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.

QQQI: Ordinary incomeVIG: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, QQQI or VIG?

VIG wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but QQQI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

QQQI vs VIG: which has a higher dividend yield?

QQQI yields 0.09% and VIG yields 1.48%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $139 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is QQQI or VIG a safer dividend in 2026?

QQQI scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VIG scores 7.2/10 (Solid). VIG is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, QQQI or VIG?