Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
OKE vs XOM
ONEOK, Inc. versus ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
XOM wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but OKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | OKE | XOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.73% | 2.63% | OKE wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 8.0/10 | XOM wins |
| Growth trend | -0.77% vs 5y | -1.07% vs 5y | XOM wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.76 | 0.16 | XOM wins |
| Scale | $57.0B | $650.5B | XOM wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 4 wins | XOM wins |
Dimension by dimension
OKE wins on yield (4.73% vs 2.63%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $210 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
XOM wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. XOM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
XOM shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
XOM's yield is 1.07% below its 5y average, versus 0.77% for OKE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
XOM is less volatile (beta 0.16 vs 0.76)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
XOM is 11.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, OKE or XOM?
XOM wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but OKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
OKE vs XOM: which has a higher dividend yield?
OKE yields 4.73% and XOM yields 2.63%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $210 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is OKE or XOM a safer dividend in 2026?
OKE scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. XOM scores 8.0/10 (Strong). XOM is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, OKE or XOM?
XOM's yield is 1.07% below its 5y average, versus 0.77% for OKE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
OKE vs XOM: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own OKE or XOM? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding XOM to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →