Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
NTR vs NUE
Nutrien Ltd. versus Nucor Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
NUE wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NTR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | NTR | NUE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.87% | 0.90% | NTR wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.0/10 | 8.6/10 | NUE wins |
| Growth trend | -0.42% vs 5y | -0.51% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | — | — | Tie |
| Scale | $37.0B | $60.5B | NUE wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 2 wins | NUE wins |
Dimension by dimension
NTR wins on yield (2.87% vs 0.90%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $197 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NUE wins on safety (8.6/10 vs 8.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. NUE scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
Volatility comparison unavailable
Beta data missing for one or both tickers.
NUE is 1.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, NTR or NUE?
NUE wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NTR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NTR vs NUE: which has a higher dividend yield?
NTR yields 2.87% and NUE yields 0.90%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $197 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is NTR or NUE a safer dividend in 2026?
NTR scores 8.0/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NUE scores 8.6/10 (Strong). NUE is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, NTR or NUE?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
NTR vs NUE: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own NTR or NUE? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding NUE to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →