Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
NNN vs WPC
NNN REIT, Inc. versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
WPC wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | NNN | WPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 5.49% | 5.14% | NNN wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 5.5/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | +0.31% vs 5y | -0.67% vs 5y | WPC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.80 | 0.79 | Tie |
| Scale | $8.3B | $15.9B | WPC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 2 wins | WPC wins |
Dimension by dimension
NNN wins on yield (5.49% vs 5.14%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $35 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Safety scores are too close to call (5.2/10 vs 5.5/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
WPC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
WPC's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for NNN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
WPC is 1.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, NNN or WPC?
WPC wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does NNN or WPC have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $35 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is NNN or WPC a safer dividend?
NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both NNN and WPC?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own NNN or WPC? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding WPC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →