Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
NNN vs VICI
NNN REIT, Inc. versus Vici Properties Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
VICI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | NNN | VICI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 5.49% | 6.64% | VICI wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 5.0/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | +0.31% vs 5y | +1.49% vs 5y | NNN wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.80 | 0.68 | VICI wins |
| Scale | $8.3B | $29.9B | VICI wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | VICI wins |
Dimension by dimension
VICI wins on yield (6.64% vs 5.49%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $115 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Safety scores are too close to call (5.2/10 vs 5.0/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
NNN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
NNN's yield is 0.31% above its 5y average, versus 1.49% for VICI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
VICI is less volatile (beta 0.68 vs 0.80)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
VICI is 3.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, NNN or VICI?
VICI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NNN vs VICI: which has a higher dividend yield?
NNN yields 5.49% and VICI yields 6.64%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $115 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is NNN or VICI a safer dividend in 2026?
NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VICI scores 5.0/10 (Mixed). NNN is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, NNN or VICI?
NNN's yield is 0.31% above its 5y average, versus 1.49% for VICI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
NNN vs VICI: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own NNN or VICI? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VICI to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →