Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
LYB vs NTR
LyondellBasell Industries N.V. versus Nutrien Ltd. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
NTR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LYB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | LYB | NTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 6.58% | 2.87% | LYB wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 | NTR wins |
| Growth trend | +0.33% vs 5y | -0.42% vs 5y | NTR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.33 | 1.17 | LYB wins |
| Scale | $20.0B | $37.0B | NTR wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | NTR wins |
Dimension by dimension
LYB wins on yield (6.58% vs 2.87%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $371 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NTR wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 4.5/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. NTR scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
NTR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
NTR's yield is 0.42% below its 5y average, versus 0.33% for LYB. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
LYB is less volatile (beta 0.33 vs 1.17)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
NTR is 1.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, LYB or NTR?
NTR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LYB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does LYB or NTR have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $371 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is LYB or NTR a safer dividend?
LYB scores 4.5/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NTR scores 8.0/10 (Strong). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both LYB and NTR?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own LYB or NTR? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding NTR to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →