Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
LOW vs YUM
Lowe's Companies, Inc. versus Yum! Brands, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
YUM wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LOW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
LOW or YUM — which is better?
YUM wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. YUM yields 1.93% — lower than LOW's 2.69% — and carries a 8.0/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 7.1/10 for LOW (Solid). YUM wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LOW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, LOW generates 2.69% vs 1.93% — a 0.76% difference that translates to $760 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, YUM scores 8.0/10 (Strong) vs 7.1/10 (Solid) for LOW — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | LOW | YUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.69% | 1.93% | LOW wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.1/10 | 8.0/10 | YUM wins |
| Growth trend | +0.88% vs 5y | +0.13% vs 5y | YUM wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.88 | 0.66 | YUM wins |
| Scale | $104.1B | $42.9B | LOW wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | YUM wins |
Dimension by dimension
LOW wins on yield (2.69% vs 1.93%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $76 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
LOW's higher yield (2.69%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus YUM's 1.93% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
YUM wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 7.1/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. YUM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
YUM (8.0/10) scores 0.9 points higher than LOW (7.1/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
YUM shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
YUM's yield is 0.13% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for LOW. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
YUM is less volatile (beta 0.66 vs 0.88)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
LOW is 2.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are LOW dividends qualified and are YUM dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
LOW or YUM — which is better?
YUM is better on our scoring, winning 3–2 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. YUM wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LOW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, LOW or YUM?
YUM wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LOW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
LOW vs YUM: which has a higher dividend yield?
LOW yields 2.69% and YUM yields 1.93%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $76 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is LOW or YUM a safer dividend in 2026?
LOW scores 7.1/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. YUM scores 8.0/10 (Strong). YUM is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, LOW or YUM?
YUM's yield is 0.13% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for LOW. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
LOW vs YUM: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when LOW vs YUM data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put LOW and YUM into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding YUM diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.