Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
LIN vs NTR
Linde plc versus Nutrien Ltd. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
LIN and NTR are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | LIN | NTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.26% | 2.87% | NTR wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -0.04% vs 5y | -0.42% vs 5y | NTR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.74 | 1.17 | LIN wins |
| Scale | $234.0B | $37.0B | LIN wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
NTR wins on yield (2.87% vs 1.26%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $161 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NTR's higher yield (2.87%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus LIN's 1.26% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.8/10 vs 8.0/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
NTR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
NTR's yield is 0.42% below its 5y average, versus 0.04% for LIN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
LIN is less volatile (beta 0.74 vs 1.17)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
LIN is 6.3× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, LIN or NTR?
LIN and NTR are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
LIN vs NTR: which has a higher dividend yield?
LIN yields 1.26% and NTR yields 2.87%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $161 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is LIN or NTR a safer dividend in 2026?
LIN scores 7.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NTR scores 8.0/10 (Strong). NTR is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, LIN or NTR?
NTR's yield is 0.42% below its 5y average, versus 0.04% for LIN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
LIN vs NTR: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when LIN vs NTR data updates.
Already own LIN or NTR? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →