Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
JPM vs MA
JPMorgan Chase & Co. versus Mastercard Incorporated — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
JPM wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but MA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
JPM wins this comparison 4–1 across 6 dimensions. JPM yields 1.68% — higher than MA's 0.61% — and carries a 9.5/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 8.3/10 for MA (Strong). JPM wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but MA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, JPM generates 1.68% vs 0.61% — a 1.07% difference that translates to $1,070 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, JPM scores 9.5/10 (Strong) vs 8.3/10 (Strong) for MA — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | JPM | MA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.68% | 0.61% | JPM wins |
| Dividend safety | 9.5/10 | 8.3/10 | JPM wins |
| Growth trend | -0.71% vs 5y | +0.07% vs 5y | JPM wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.98 | 0.73 | MA wins |
| Scale | $950.6B | $502.0B | JPM wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 4 wins | 1 wins | JPM wins |
Dimension by dimension
JPM wins on yield (1.68% vs 0.61%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $107 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
JPM's higher yield (1.68%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus MA's 0.61% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
JPM wins on safety (9.5/10 vs 8.3/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. JPM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
JPM (9.5/10) scores 1.2 points higher than MA (8.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
JPM shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
JPM's yield is 0.71% below its 5y average, versus 0.07% for MA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
MA is less volatile (beta 0.73 vs 0.98)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
JPM is 1.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, JPM or MA?
JPM wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but MA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
JPM vs MA: which has a higher dividend yield?
JPM yields 1.68% and MA yields 0.61%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $107 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is JPM or MA a safer dividend in 2026?
JPM scores 9.5/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MA scores 8.3/10 (Strong). JPM is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, JPM or MA?
JPM's yield is 0.71% below its 5y average, versus 0.07% for MA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
JPM vs MA: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when JPM vs MA data updates.
Already own JPM or MA? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding JPM to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →