Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
IDV vs SCHY
iShares International Select Dividend ETF versus Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IDV and SCHY are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | IDV | SCHY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.63% | 3.50% | IDV wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 7.3/10 | SCHY wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 50.00% | 8.00% | SCHY wins |
| Scale | $7.9B | $2.3B | IDV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
IDV wins on yield (4.63% vs 3.50%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $113 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
IDV's higher yield (4.63%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus SCHY's 3.50% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
SCHY wins on safety (7.3/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. SCHY scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
SCHY (7.3/10) scores 0.5 points higher than IDV (6.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
SCHY is cheaper (8.00% vs 50.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $4200/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, SCHY's lower expense ratio saves roughly $42/year in fees versus IDV. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
IDV is 3.4× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, IDV or SCHY?
IDV and SCHY are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
IDV vs SCHY: which has a higher dividend yield?
IDV yields 4.63% and SCHY yields 3.50%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $113 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is IDV or SCHY a safer dividend in 2026?
IDV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SCHY scores 7.3/10 (Solid). SCHY is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, IDV or SCHY?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IDV vs SCHY: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when IDV vs SCHY data updates.
Already own IDV or SCHY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →