Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
HDV vs SCHY
iShares Core High Dividend ETF versus Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
HDV wins 1–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
HDV wins this comparison 1–0 across 6 dimensions. HDV yields 3.34% — higher than SCHY's 3.33% — and carries a 7.6/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.3/10 for SCHY (Solid). HDV wins 1–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Both tickers are closely matched on the two dimensions income investors care about most — yield and dividend safety — making this a genuine toss-up where portfolio fit, tax treatment, and expense ratio should drive the final call.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | HDV | SCHY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.34% | 3.33% | Tie |
| Dividend safety | 7.6/10 | 7.3/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 8.00% | 8.00% | Tie |
| Scale | $15.5B | $2.5B | HDV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 0 wins | HDV wins |
Dimension by dimension
HDV and SCHY have nearly identical yields (3.34% vs 3.33%)
Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.6/10 vs 7.3/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
Expense ratios are effectively identical
Both ETFs charge 8.00% — no meaningful cost difference over decades of compounding.
HDV is 6.1× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, HDV or SCHY?
HDV wins 1–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
HDV vs SCHY: which has a higher dividend yield?
HDV yields 3.34% and SCHY yields 3.33%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Is HDV or SCHY a safer dividend in 2026?
HDV scores 7.6/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SCHY scores 7.3/10 (Solid). HDV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, HDV or SCHY?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
HDV vs SCHY: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when HDV vs SCHY data updates.
Already own HDV or SCHY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding HDV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →