Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

GLPI vs WPC

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

WPC wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLPI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	GLPI	WPC	Winner
Yield	6.60%	5.14%	GLPI wins
Dividend safety	4.9/10	5.5/10	WPC wins
Growth trend	+0.59% vs 5y	-0.67% vs 5y	WPC wins
Volatility (beta)	0.71	0.79	Tie
Scale	$13.4B	$15.9B	Tie
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	1 wins	2 wins	WPC wins

Dimension by dimension

GLPI wins on yield (6.60% vs 5.14%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $146 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

GLPI's higher yield (6.60%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus WPC's 5.14% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

GLPI: 6.60%WPC: 5.14%

WPC wins on safety (5.5/10 vs 4.9/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. WPC scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

WPC (5.5/10) scores 0.6 points higher than GLPI (4.9/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

GLPI: 4.9/10WPC: 5.5/10

WPC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

WPC's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

GLPI: +0.59% vs 5yWPC: -0.67% vs 5y

Volatility (beta) is similar

Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.

GLPI: 0.71WPC: 0.79

Comparable scale ($13.4B vs $15.9B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

GLPI: $13.4BWPC: $15.9B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

GLPI: Ordinary incomeWPC: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, GLPI or WPC?

WPC wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLPI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

GLPI vs WPC: which has a higher dividend yield?

GLPI yields 6.60% and WPC yields 5.14%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $146 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is GLPI or WPC a safer dividend in 2026?

GLPI scores 4.9/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). WPC is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, GLPI or WPC?