Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

GLPI vs NNN

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. versus NNN REIT, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

GLPI wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	GLPI	NNN	Winner
Yield	6.60%	5.49%	GLPI wins
Dividend safety	4.9/10	5.2/10	Tie
Growth trend	+0.59% vs 5y	+0.31% vs 5y	NNN wins
Volatility (beta)	0.71	0.80	Tie
Scale	$13.4B	$8.3B	GLPI wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	2 wins	1 wins	GLPI wins

Dimension by dimension

GLPI wins on yield (6.60% vs 5.49%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

GLPI's higher yield (6.60%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NNN's 5.49% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

GLPI: 6.60%NNN: 5.49%

Safety scores are too close to call (4.9/10 vs 5.2/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

GLPI: 4.9/10NNN: 5.2/10

NNN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

NNN's yield is 0.31% above its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

GLPI: +0.59% vs 5yNNN: +0.31% vs 5y

Volatility (beta) is similar

Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.

GLPI: 0.71NNN: 0.80

GLPI is 1.6× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

GLPI: $13.4BNNN: $8.3B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

GLPI: Ordinary incomeNNN: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, GLPI or NNN?

GLPI wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

GLPI vs NNN: which has a higher dividend yield?

GLPI yields 6.60% and NNN yields 5.49%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is GLPI or NNN a safer dividend in 2026?

GLPI scores 4.9/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed). NNN is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, GLPI or NNN?