Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
GILD vs UNH
Gilead Sciences, Inc. versus UnitedHealth Group Incorporated — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
GILD wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but UNH can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | GILD | UNH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.57% | 2.24% | GILD wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.8/10 | 7.0/10 | GILD wins |
| Growth trend | -1.12% vs 5y | +0.61% vs 5y | GILD wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.40 | 0.65 | GILD wins |
| Scale | $158.6B | $357.7B | UNH wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 4 wins | 1 wins | GILD wins |
Dimension by dimension
GILD wins on yield (2.57% vs 2.24%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $33 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
GILD wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 7.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. GILD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
GILD shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
GILD's yield is 1.12% below its 5y average, versus 0.61% for UNH. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
GILD is less volatile (beta 0.40 vs 0.65)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
UNH is 2.3× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, GILD or UNH?
GILD wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but UNH can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
GILD vs UNH: which has a higher dividend yield?
GILD yields 2.57% and UNH yields 2.24%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $33 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is GILD or UNH a safer dividend in 2026?
GILD scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. UNH scores 7.0/10 (Solid). GILD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, GILD or UNH?
GILD's yield is 1.12% below its 5y average, versus 0.61% for UNH. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
GILD vs UNH: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own GILD or UNH? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding GILD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →