Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

GAIN vs GLAD

Gladstone Investment Corporation versus Gladstone Capital Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

GAIN wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLAD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	GAIN	GLAD	Winner
Yield	6.17%	9.69%	GLAD wins
Dividend safety	6.3/10	3.0/10	GAIN wins
Growth trend	-0.44% vs 5y	+1.46% vs 5y	GAIN wins
Volatility (beta)	0.76	0.92	GAIN wins
Scale	$620M	$428M	Tie
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	3 wins	1 wins	GAIN wins

Dimension by dimension

GLAD wins on yield (9.69% vs 6.17%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $352 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

GLAD's higher yield (9.69%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus GAIN's 6.17% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

GAIN: 6.17%GLAD: 9.69%

GAIN wins on safety (6.3/10 vs 3.0/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. GAIN scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

GAIN (6.3/10) scores 3.3 points higher than GLAD (3.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

GAIN: 6.3/10GLAD: 3.0/10

GAIN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

GAIN's yield is 0.44% below its 5y average, versus 1.46% for GLAD. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

GAIN: -0.44% vs 5yGLAD: +1.46% vs 5y

GAIN is less volatile (beta 0.76 vs 0.92)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

GAIN: 0.76GLAD: 0.92

Comparable scale ($620M vs $428M)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

GAIN: $620MGLAD: $428M

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

GAIN: Qualified-eligibleGLAD: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, GAIN or GLAD?

GAIN wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLAD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

GAIN vs GLAD: which has a higher dividend yield?

GAIN yields 6.17% and GLAD yields 9.69%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $352 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is GAIN or GLAD a safer dividend in 2026?

GAIN scores 6.3/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. GLAD scores 3.0/10 (Risky). GAIN is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, GAIN or GLAD?