Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
EPR vs WPC
EPR Properties versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
WPC wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | EPR | WPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 6.25% | 5.14% | EPR wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.6/10 | 5.5/10 | WPC wins |
| Growth trend | -0.53% vs 5y | -0.67% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.03 | 0.79 | WPC wins |
| Scale | $4.4B | $15.9B | WPC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | WPC wins |
Dimension by dimension
EPR wins on yield (6.25% vs 5.14%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
EPR's higher yield (6.25%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus WPC's 5.14% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
WPC wins on safety (5.5/10 vs 4.6/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. WPC scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
WPC (5.5/10) scores 0.9 points higher than EPR (4.6/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
WPC is less volatile (beta 0.79 vs 1.03)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
WPC is 3.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, EPR or WPC?
WPC wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
EPR vs WPC: which has a higher dividend yield?
EPR yields 6.25% and WPC yields 5.14%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is EPR or WPC a safer dividend in 2026?
EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). WPC is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, EPR or WPC?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
EPR vs WPC: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when EPR vs WPC data updates.
Already own EPR or WPC? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding WPC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →