Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

EPR vs NNN

EPR Properties versus NNN REIT, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

NNN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	EPR	NNN	Winner
Yield	6.25%	5.49%	EPR wins
Dividend safety	4.6/10	5.2/10	NNN wins
Growth trend	-0.53% vs 5y	+0.31% vs 5y	EPR wins
Volatility (beta)	1.03	0.80	NNN wins
Scale	$4.4B	$8.3B	NNN wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	2 wins	3 wins	NNN wins

Dimension by dimension

EPR wins on yield (6.25% vs 5.49%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $76 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

EPR's higher yield (6.25%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NNN's 5.49% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

EPR: 6.25%NNN: 5.49%

NNN wins on safety (5.2/10 vs 4.6/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. NNN scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

NNN (5.2/10) scores 0.6 points higher than EPR (4.6/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

EPR: 4.6/10NNN: 5.2/10

EPR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

EPR's yield is 0.53% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for NNN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

EPR: -0.53% vs 5yNNN: +0.31% vs 5y

NNN is less volatile (beta 0.80 vs 1.03)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

EPR: 1.03NNN: 0.80

NNN is 1.9× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

EPR: $4.4BNNN: $8.3B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

EPR: Ordinary incomeNNN: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, EPR or NNN?

NNN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

EPR vs NNN: which has a higher dividend yield?

EPR yields 6.25% and NNN yields 5.49%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $76 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is EPR or NNN a safer dividend in 2026?

EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed). NNN is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, EPR or NNN?