Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DVY vs SCHY
iShares Select Dividend ETF versus Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
SCHY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DVY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DVY | SCHY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.29% | 3.50% | SCHY wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.6/10 | 7.3/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 38.00% | 8.00% | SCHY wins |
| Scale | $26.4B | $2.3B | DVY wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 2 wins | SCHY wins |
Dimension by dimension
SCHY wins on yield (3.50% vs 3.29%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $21 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
SCHY's higher yield (3.50%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DVY's 3.29% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.6/10 vs 7.3/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
SCHY is cheaper (8.00% vs 38.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $3000/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, SCHY's lower expense ratio saves roughly $30/year in fees versus DVY. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
DVY is 11.4× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DVY or SCHY?
SCHY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DVY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DVY vs SCHY: which has a higher dividend yield?
DVY yields 3.29% and SCHY yields 3.50%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $21 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DVY or SCHY a safer dividend in 2026?
DVY scores 7.6/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SCHY scores 7.3/10 (Solid). DVY is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DVY or SCHY?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DVY vs SCHY: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when DVY vs SCHY data updates.
Already own DVY or SCHY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding SCHY to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →