Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DUK vs PPL
Duke Energy Corporation versus PPL Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
DUK wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PPL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DUK | PPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.36% | 2.95% | DUK wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 7.5/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -0.47% vs 5y | -0.94% vs 5y | PPL wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.37 | 0.68 | DUK wins |
| Scale | $101.8B | $29.0B | DUK wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 1 wins | DUK wins |
Dimension by dimension
DUK wins on yield (3.36% vs 2.95%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $41 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
DUK's higher yield (3.36%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PPL's 2.95% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.5/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
PPL shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
PPL's yield is 0.94% below its 5y average, versus 0.47% for DUK. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
DUK is less volatile (beta 0.37 vs 0.68)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
DUK is 3.5× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DUK or PPL?
DUK wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PPL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DUK vs PPL: which has a higher dividend yield?
DUK yields 3.36% and PPL yields 2.95%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $41 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DUK or PPL a safer dividend in 2026?
DUK scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PPL scores 7.5/10 (Solid). PPL is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DUK or PPL?
PPL's yield is 0.94% below its 5y average, versus 0.47% for DUK. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
DUK vs PPL: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when DUK vs PPL data updates.
Already own DUK or PPL? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding DUK to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →