Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DIVO vs VYM
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF versus Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
VYM wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DIVO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.26% | 2.30% | Tie |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 7.9/10 | VYM wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 56.00% | 4.00% | VYM wins |
| Scale | $7.2B | $96.2B | VYM wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Qualified-eligible | VYM wins |
| Overall | 0 wins | 4 wins | VYM wins |
Dimension by dimension
DIVO and VYM have nearly identical yields (2.26% vs 2.30%)
Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
VYM wins on safety (7.9/10 vs 7.3/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. VYM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
VYM (7.9/10) scores 0.6 points higher than DIVO (7.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
VYM is cheaper (4.00% vs 56.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $5200/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, VYM's lower expense ratio saves roughly $52/year in fees versus DIVO. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
VYM is 13.4× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
VYM is more tax-efficient in a taxable account
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from VYM which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DIVO or VYM?
VYM wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DIVO vs VYM: which has a higher dividend yield?
DIVO yields 2.26% and VYM yields 2.30%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Is DIVO or VYM a safer dividend in 2026?
DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VYM scores 7.9/10 (Solid). VYM is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DIVO or VYM?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DIVO vs VYM: which is more tax-efficient?
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from VYM which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
Get emailed when DIVO vs VYM data updates.
Already own DIVO or VYM? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VYM to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →