Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DIVO vs VWO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF versus Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
VWO wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DIVO | VWO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.26% | 2.32% | VWO wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 7.9/10 | VWO wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 56.00% | 6.00% | VWO wins |
| Scale | $7.2B | $163.3B | VWO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Qualified-eligible | VWO wins |
| Overall | 0 wins | 5 wins | VWO wins |
Dimension by dimension
VWO wins on yield (2.32% vs 2.26%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $6 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
VWO wins on safety (7.9/10 vs 7.3/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. VWO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
VWO (7.9/10) scores 0.6 points higher than DIVO (7.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
VWO is cheaper (6.00% vs 56.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $5000/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, VWO's lower expense ratio saves roughly $50/year in fees versus DIVO. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
VWO is 22.7× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
VWO is more tax-efficient in a taxable account
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from VWO which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DIVO or VWO?
VWO wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DIVO vs VWO: which has a higher dividend yield?
DIVO yields 2.26% and VWO yields 2.32%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $6 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DIVO or VWO a safer dividend in 2026?
DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VWO scores 7.9/10 (Solid). VWO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DIVO or VWO?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DIVO vs VWO: which is more tax-efficient?
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from VWO which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
Get emailed when DIVO vs VWO data updates.
Already own DIVO or VWO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VWO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →