Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

DIVO vs HDV

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF versus iShares Core High Dividend ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

HDV wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

HDV wins this comparison 4–0 across 6 dimensions. HDV yields 3.34% — higher than DIVO's 2.94% — and carries a 7.6/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.3/10 for DIVO (Solid). HDV wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, HDV generates 3.34% vs 2.94% — a 0.40% difference that translates to $400 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	DIVO	HDV	Winner
Yield	2.94%	3.34%	HDV wins
Dividend safety	7.3/10	7.6/10	Tie
Growth trend	—	—	Tie
Expense ratio	56.00%	8.00%	HDV wins
Scale	$7.9B	$15.5B	HDV wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Qualified-eligible	HDV wins
Overall	0 wins	4 wins	HDV wins

Dimension by dimension

HDV wins on yield (3.34% vs 2.94%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $40 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

HDV's higher yield (3.34%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DIVO's 2.94% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

DIVO: 2.94%HDV: 3.34%

Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.6/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

DIVO: 7.3/10HDV: 7.6/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

DIVO: —HDV: —

HDV is cheaper (8.00% vs 56.00%)

On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $4800/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.

On $10,000 invested, HDV's lower expense ratio saves roughly $48/year in fees versus DIVO. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.

DIVO: 56.00%HDV: 8.00%

HDV is 2.0× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

DIVO: $7.9BHDV: $15.5B

HDV is more tax-efficient in a taxable account

DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from HDV which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.

DIVO: Ordinary incomeHDV: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, DIVO or HDV?

HDV wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

DIVO vs HDV: which has a higher dividend yield?

DIVO yields 2.94% and HDV yields 3.34%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $40 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is DIVO or HDV a safer dividend in 2026?

DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. HDV scores 7.6/10 (Solid). HDV is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, DIVO or HDV?