Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DHR vs SYK
Danaher Corporation versus Stryker Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
SYK wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DHR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DHR | SYK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.88% | 1.07% | SYK wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.9/10 | 7.6/10 | SYK wins |
| Growth trend | +0.46% vs 5y | +0.08% vs 5y | SYK wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.96 | 0.93 | Tie |
| Scale | $130.1B | $126.0B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 3 wins | SYK wins |
Dimension by dimension
SYK wins on yield (1.07% vs 0.88%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $19 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
SYK wins on safety (7.6/10 vs 6.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. SYK scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
SYK shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
SYK's yield is 0.08% above its 5y average, versus 0.46% for DHR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
Comparable scale ($130.1B vs $126.0B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DHR or SYK?
SYK wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DHR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DHR vs SYK: which has a higher dividend yield?
DHR yields 0.88% and SYK yields 1.07%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $19 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DHR or SYK a safer dividend in 2026?
DHR scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SYK scores 7.6/10 (Solid). SYK is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DHR or SYK?
SYK's yield is 0.08% above its 5y average, versus 0.46% for DHR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
DHR vs SYK: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own DHR or SYK? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding SYK to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →