Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DGRO vs DIVO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF versus Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
DGRO wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DGRO | DIVO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.95% | 2.26% | DIVO wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.6/10 | 7.3/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 8.00% | 56.00% | DGRO wins |
| Scale | $41.2B | $7.2B | DGRO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Ordinary income | DGRO wins |
| Overall | 3 wins | 1 wins | DGRO wins |
Dimension by dimension
DIVO wins on yield (2.26% vs 1.95%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $31 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
DIVO's higher yield (2.26%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DGRO's 1.95% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.6/10 vs 7.3/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRO is cheaper (8.00% vs 56.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $4800/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, DGRO's lower expense ratio saves roughly $48/year in fees versus DIVO. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
DGRO is 5.7× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
DGRO is more tax-efficient in a taxable account
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from DGRO which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DGRO or DIVO?
DGRO wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DGRO vs DIVO: which has a higher dividend yield?
DGRO yields 1.95% and DIVO yields 2.26%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $31 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DGRO or DIVO a safer dividend in 2026?
DGRO scores 7.6/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid). DGRO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DGRO or DIVO?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRO vs DIVO: which is more tax-efficient?
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from DGRO which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
Get emailed when DGRO vs DIVO data updates.
Already own DGRO or DIVO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding DGRO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →