Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DE vs ROK
Deere & Company versus Rockwell Automation Inc — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
DE wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but ROK can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DE wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. DE yields 1.09% — lower than ROK's 1.38% — and carries a 8.1/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 6.8/10 for ROK (Solid). DE wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but ROK can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, DE scores 8.1/10 (Strong) vs 6.8/10 (Solid) for ROK — DE has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, ROK's 1.38% vs 1.09% represents a $290 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DE | ROK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.09% | 1.38% | ROK wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.1/10 | 6.8/10 | DE wins |
| Growth trend | -0.15% vs 5y | -0.26% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.90 | 1.54 | DE wins |
| Scale | $160.1B | $45.0B | DE wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 1 wins | DE wins |
Dimension by dimension
ROK wins on yield (1.38% vs 1.09%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $29 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ROK's higher yield (1.38%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DE's 1.09% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
DE wins on safety (8.1/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. DE scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
DE (8.1/10) scores 1.3 points higher than ROK (6.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
DE is less volatile (beta 0.90 vs 1.54)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
DE is 3.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DE or ROK?
DE wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but ROK can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DE vs ROK: which has a higher dividend yield?
DE yields 1.09% and ROK yields 1.38%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $29 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DE or ROK a safer dividend in 2026?
DE scores 8.1/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. ROK scores 6.8/10 (Solid). DE is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DE or ROK?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
DE vs ROK: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when DE vs ROK data updates.
Already own DE or ROK? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding DE to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →