Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
C vs WFC
Citigroup Inc. versus Wells Fargo & Company — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
C and WFC are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Neither C nor WFC wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. C and WFC are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
On dividend safety, C scores 9.5/10 (Strong) vs 9.0/10 (Strong) for WFC — C has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, WFC's 2.23% vs 2.04% represents a $190 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | C | WFC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.04% | 2.23% | WFC wins |
| Dividend safety | 9.5/10 | 9.0/10 | C wins |
| Growth trend | -1.38% vs 5y | +0.09% vs 5y | C wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.10 | 0.92 | WFC wins |
| Scale | $220.8B | $270.5B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
WFC wins on yield (2.23% vs 2.04%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $19 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
WFC's higher yield (2.23%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus C's 2.04% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
C wins on safety (9.5/10 vs 9.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. C scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
C (9.5/10) scores 0.5 points higher than WFC (9.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
C shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
C's yield is 1.38% below its 5y average, versus 0.09% for WFC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
WFC is less volatile (beta 0.92 vs 1.10)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($220.8B vs $270.5B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, C or WFC?
C and WFC are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
C vs WFC: which has a higher dividend yield?
C yields 2.04% and WFC yields 2.23%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $19 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is C or WFC a safer dividend in 2026?
C scores 9.5/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WFC scores 9.0/10 (Strong). C is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, C or WFC?
C's yield is 1.38% below its 5y average, versus 0.09% for WFC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
C vs WFC: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when C vs WFC data updates.
Already own C or WFC? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →