Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

BTI vs PG

British American Tobacco p.l.c. ADR versus The Procter & Gamble Company — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

BTI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

BTI wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. BTI yields 5.94% — higher than PG's 3.05% — and carries a 7.3/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.0/10 for PG (Solid). BTI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, BTI generates 5.94% vs 3.05% — a 2.89% difference that translates to $2,890 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	BTI	PG	Winner
Yield	5.94%	3.05%	BTI wins
Dividend safety	7.3/10	7.0/10	Tie
Growth trend	-1.46% vs 5y	+0.55% vs 5y	BTI wins
Volatility (beta)	0.13	0.38	BTI wins
Scale	$121.1B	$332.3B	PG wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	3 wins	1 wins	BTI wins

Dimension by dimension

BTI wins on yield (5.94% vs 3.05%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $289 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

BTI's higher yield (5.94%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PG's 3.05% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

BTI: 5.94%PG: 3.05%

Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.0/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

BTI: 7.3/10PG: 7.0/10

BTI shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

BTI's yield is 1.46% below its 5y average, versus 0.55% for PG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

BTI: -1.46% vs 5yPG: +0.55% vs 5y

BTI is less volatile (beta 0.13 vs 0.38)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

BTI: 0.13PG: 0.38

PG is 2.7× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

BTI: $121.1BPG: $332.3B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

BTI: Qualified-eligiblePG: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, BTI or PG?

BTI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

BTI vs PG: which has a higher dividend yield?

BTI yields 5.94% and PG yields 3.05%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $289 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is BTI or PG a safer dividend in 2026?

BTI scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PG scores 7.0/10 (Solid). BTI is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, BTI or PG?