Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

BTI vs CLX

British American Tobacco p.l.c. ADR versus Clorox Co. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

BTI wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but CLX can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	BTI	CLX	Winner
Yield	5.14%	4.90%	BTI wins
Dividend safety	7.3/10	5.3/10	BTI wins
Growth trend	-2.37% vs 5y	+1.59% vs 5y	BTI wins
Volatility (beta)	0.12	0.65	BTI wins
Scale	$140.4B	$12.3B	BTI wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	5 wins	0 wins	BTI wins

Dimension by dimension

BTI wins on yield (5.14% vs 4.90%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $24 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

BTI's higher yield (5.14%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus CLX's 4.90% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

BTI: 5.14%CLX: 4.90%

BTI wins on safety (7.3/10 vs 5.3/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. BTI scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

BTI (7.3/10) scores 2.0 points higher than CLX (5.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

BTI: 7.3/10CLX: 5.3/10

BTI shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

BTI's yield is 2.37% below its 5y average, versus 1.59% for CLX. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

BTI: -2.37% vs 5yCLX: +1.59% vs 5y

BTI is less volatile (beta 0.12 vs 0.65)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

BTI: 0.12CLX: 0.65

BTI is 11.4× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

BTI: $140.4BCLX: $12.3B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

BTI: Qualified-eligibleCLX: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, BTI or CLX?

BTI wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but CLX can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

BTI vs CLX: which has a higher dividend yield?

BTI yields 5.14% and CLX yields 4.90%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $24 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is BTI or CLX a safer dividend in 2026?

BTI scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. CLX scores 5.3/10 (Mixed). BTI is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, BTI or CLX?