Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

BLK vs MA

BlackRock, Inc. versus Mastercard Incorporated — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

BLK and MA are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Neither BLK nor MA wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. BLK and MA are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

On yield alone, BLK generates 2.10% vs 0.61% — a 1.49% difference that translates to $1,490 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	BLK	MA	Winner
Yield	2.10%	0.61%	BLK wins
Dividend safety	8.3/10	8.3/10	Tie
Growth trend	-0.25% vs 5y	+0.07% vs 5y	BLK wins
Volatility (beta)	1.44	0.73	MA wins
Scale	$177.3B	$502.0B	MA wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	2 wins	2 wins	Tie

Dimension by dimension

BLK wins on yield (2.10% vs 0.61%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $149 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

BLK's higher yield (2.10%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus MA's 0.61% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

BLK: 2.10%MA: 0.61%

Safety scores are too close to call (8.3/10 vs 8.3/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

BLK: 8.3/10MA: 8.3/10

BLK shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

BLK's yield is 0.25% below its 5y average, versus 0.07% for MA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

BLK: -0.25% vs 5yMA: +0.07% vs 5y

MA is less volatile (beta 0.73 vs 1.44)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

BLK: 1.44MA: 0.73

MA is 2.8× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

BLK: $177.3BMA: $502.0B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

BLK: Qualified-eligibleMA: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, BLK or MA?

BLK and MA are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

BLK vs MA: which has a higher dividend yield?

BLK yields 2.10% and MA yields 0.61%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $149 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is BLK or MA a safer dividend in 2026?

BLK scores 8.3/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MA scores 8.3/10 (Strong). Both have comparable safety scores.

Which has better dividend growth, BLK or MA?