Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
BLK vs MA
BlackRock, Inc. versus Mastercard Incorporated — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
BLK wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but MA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | BLK | MA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.13% | 0.70% | BLK wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.3/10 | 7.8/10 | BLK wins |
| Growth trend | -0.20% vs 5y | +0.16% vs 5y | BLK wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.46 | 0.76 | MA wins |
| Scale | $167.2B | $436.5B | MA wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | BLK wins |
Dimension by dimension
BLK wins on yield (2.13% vs 0.70%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $143 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
BLK wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 7.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. BLK scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
BLK shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
BLK's yield is 0.20% below its 5y average, versus 0.16% for MA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
MA is less volatile (beta 0.76 vs 1.46)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
MA is 2.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, BLK or MA?
BLK wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but MA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does BLK or MA have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $143 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is BLK or MA a safer dividend?
BLK scores 8.3/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MA scores 7.8/10 (Solid). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both BLK and MA?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own BLK or MA? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding BLK to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →