Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ARCC vs MET
Ares Capital Corp. versus MetLife, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
MET wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ARCC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
MET wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. MET yields 2.92% — lower than ARCC's 9.62% — and carries a 8.3/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 3.8/10 for ARCC (Weak). MET wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ARCC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, ARCC generates 9.62% vs 2.92% — a 6.70% difference that translates to $6,700 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, MET scores 8.3/10 (Strong) vs 3.8/10 (Weak) for ARCC — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ARCC | MET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 9.62% | 2.92% | ARCC wins |
| Dividend safety | 3.8/10 | 8.3/10 | MET wins |
| Growth trend | +0.62% vs 5y | -0.03% vs 5y | MET wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.62 | 0.73 | ARCC wins |
| Scale | $14.3B | $50.6B | MET wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | MET wins |
Dimension by dimension
ARCC wins on yield (9.62% vs 2.92%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $670 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ARCC's higher yield (9.62%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus MET's 2.92% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
MET wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 3.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. MET scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
MET (8.3/10) scores 4.5 points higher than ARCC (3.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
MET shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
MET's yield is 0.03% below its 5y average, versus 0.62% for ARCC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ARCC is less volatile (beta 0.62 vs 0.73)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
MET is 3.5× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ARCC or MET?
MET wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ARCC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ARCC vs MET: which has a higher dividend yield?
ARCC yields 9.62% and MET yields 2.92%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $670 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ARCC or MET a safer dividend in 2026?
ARCC scores 3.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MET scores 8.3/10 (Strong). MET is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ARCC or MET?
MET's yield is 0.03% below its 5y average, versus 0.62% for ARCC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ARCC vs MET: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ARCC vs MET data updates.
Already own ARCC or MET? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding MET to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →