Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
APD vs NTR
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. versus Nutrien Ltd. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
NTR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but APD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NTR wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. NTR yields 2.87% — higher than APD's 2.48% — and carries a 8.0/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 6.7/10 for APD (Solid). NTR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but APD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, NTR scores 8.0/10 (Strong) vs 6.7/10 (Solid) for APD — NTR has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, NTR's 2.87% vs 2.48% represents a $390 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | APD | NTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.48% | 2.87% | NTR wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.7/10 | 8.0/10 | NTR wins |
| Growth trend | +0.08% vs 5y | -0.42% vs 5y | NTR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.86 | 1.17 | APD wins |
| Scale | $64.9B | $37.0B | APD wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | NTR wins |
Dimension by dimension
NTR wins on yield (2.87% vs 2.48%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $39 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NTR's higher yield (2.87%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus APD's 2.48% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
NTR wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 6.7/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. NTR scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
NTR (8.0/10) scores 1.3 points higher than APD (6.7/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
NTR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
NTR's yield is 0.42% below its 5y average, versus 0.08% for APD. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
APD is less volatile (beta 0.86 vs 1.17)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
APD is 1.8× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, APD or NTR?
NTR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but APD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
APD vs NTR: which has a higher dividend yield?
APD yields 2.48% and NTR yields 2.87%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $39 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is APD or NTR a safer dividend in 2026?
APD scores 6.7/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NTR scores 8.0/10 (Strong). NTR is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, APD or NTR?
NTR's yield is 0.42% below its 5y average, versus 0.08% for APD. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
APD vs NTR: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when APD vs NTR data updates.
Already own APD or NTR? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding NTR to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →