Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

AMT vs PLD

American Tower Corporation versus Prologis Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

AMT and PLD are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	AMT	PLD	Winner
Yield	3.77%	2.94%	AMT wins
Dividend safety	6.8/10	6.7/10	Tie
Growth trend	+0.88% vs 5y	+0.19% vs 5y	PLD wins
Volatility (beta)	0.90	1.34	AMT wins
Scale	$86.2B	$139.6B	PLD wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	2 wins	2 wins	Tie

Dimension by dimension

AMT wins on yield (3.77% vs 2.94%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $83 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

AMT's higher yield (3.77%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PLD's 2.94% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

AMT: 3.77%PLD: 2.94%

Safety scores are too close to call (6.8/10 vs 6.7/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

AMT: 6.8/10PLD: 6.7/10

PLD shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

PLD's yield is 0.19% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

AMT: +0.88% vs 5yPLD: +0.19% vs 5y

AMT is less volatile (beta 0.90 vs 1.34)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

AMT: 0.90PLD: 1.34

PLD is 1.6× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

AMT: $86.2BPLD: $139.6B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

AMT: Ordinary incomePLD: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, AMT or PLD?

AMT and PLD are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

AMT vs PLD: which has a higher dividend yield?

AMT yields 3.77% and PLD yields 2.94%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $83 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is AMT or PLD a safer dividend in 2026?

AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PLD scores 6.7/10 (Solid). AMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, AMT or PLD?