Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AMGN vs LLY
Amgen Inc. versus Eli Lilly and Company — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
LLY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but AMGN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AMGN | LLY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.89% | 0.63% | AMGN wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 8.8/10 | LLY wins |
| Growth trend | -0.17% vs 5y | -0.26% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.42 | 0.48 | Tie |
| Scale | $189.7B | $985.4B | LLY wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 2 wins | LLY wins |
Dimension by dimension
AMGN wins on yield (2.89% vs 0.63%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $226 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
LLY wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 7.3/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. LLY scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
LLY is 5.2× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, AMGN or LLY?
LLY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but AMGN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does AMGN or LLY have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $226 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AMGN or LLY a safer dividend?
AMGN scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. LLY scores 8.8/10 (Strong). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both AMGN and LLY?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own AMGN or LLY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding LLY to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →