Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AGNC vs NNN
AGNC Investment Corp. versus NNN REIT, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
AGNC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AGNC | NNN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 13.55% | 5.49% | AGNC wins |
| Dividend safety | 3.8/10 | 5.2/10 | NNN wins |
| Growth trend | -0.15% vs 5y | +0.31% vs 5y | AGNC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.30 | 0.80 | NNN wins |
| Scale | $12.9B | $8.3B | AGNC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | AGNC wins |
Dimension by dimension
AGNC wins on yield (13.55% vs 5.49%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $806 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NNN wins on safety (5.2/10 vs 3.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. NNN scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AGNC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
AGNC's yield is 0.15% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for NNN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
NNN is less volatile (beta 0.80 vs 1.30)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AGNC is 1.5× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, AGNC or NNN?
AGNC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but NNN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AGNC vs NNN: which has a higher dividend yield?
AGNC yields 13.55% and NNN yields 5.49%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $806 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AGNC or NNN a safer dividend in 2026?
AGNC scores 3.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed). NNN is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, AGNC or NNN?
AGNC's yield is 0.15% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for NNN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
AGNC vs NNN: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own AGNC or NNN? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding AGNC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →