Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AGNC vs GLPI
AGNC Investment Corp. versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
AGNC and GLPI are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AGNC | GLPI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 13.64% | 6.60% | AGNC wins |
| Dividend safety | 3.8/10 | 4.9/10 | GLPI wins |
| Growth trend | -0.06% vs 5y | +0.59% vs 5y | AGNC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.31 | 0.71 | GLPI wins |
| Scale | $11.8B | $13.4B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
AGNC wins on yield (13.64% vs 6.60%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $704 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
GLPI wins on safety (4.9/10 vs 3.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. GLPI scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AGNC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
AGNC's yield is 0.06% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
GLPI is less volatile (beta 0.71 vs 1.31)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($11.8B vs $13.4B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, AGNC or GLPI?
AGNC and GLPI are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Does AGNC or GLPI have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $704 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AGNC or GLPI a safer dividend?
AGNC scores 3.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. GLPI scores 4.9/10 (Weak). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both AGNC and GLPI?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own AGNC or GLPI? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →