Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AGNC vs EPR
AGNC Investment Corp. versus EPR Properties — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
EPR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AGNC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AGNC | EPR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 13.64% | 6.25% | AGNC wins |
| Dividend safety | 3.8/10 | 4.6/10 | EPR wins |
| Growth trend | -0.06% vs 5y | -0.53% vs 5y | EPR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.31 | 1.03 | EPR wins |
| Scale | $11.8B | $4.4B | AGNC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | EPR wins |
Dimension by dimension
AGNC wins on yield (13.64% vs 6.25%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $739 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
EPR wins on safety (4.6/10 vs 3.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. EPR scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
EPR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
EPR's yield is 0.53% below its 5y average, versus 0.06% for AGNC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
EPR is less volatile (beta 1.03 vs 1.31)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AGNC is 2.7× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, AGNC or EPR?
EPR wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AGNC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does AGNC or EPR have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $739 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AGNC or EPR a safer dividend?
AGNC scores 3.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both AGNC and EPR?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own AGNC or EPR? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding EPR to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →