Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABT vs GILD
Abbott Laboratories versus Gilead Sciences, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
GILD wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
GILD wins this comparison 4–0 across 6 dimensions. GILD yields 2.57% — higher than ABT's 2.39% — and carries a 8.8/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 6.8/10 for ABT (Solid). GILD wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, GILD scores 8.8/10 (Strong) vs 6.8/10 (Solid) for ABT — GILD has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, GILD's 2.57% vs 2.39% represents a $180 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABT | GILD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.39% | 2.57% | GILD wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | GILD wins |
| Growth trend | +0.57% vs 5y | -1.12% vs 5y | GILD wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.59 | 0.40 | GILD wins |
| Scale | $183.3B | $158.6B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 4 wins | GILD wins |
Dimension by dimension
GILD wins on yield (2.57% vs 2.39%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $18 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
GILD's higher yield (2.57%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ABT's 2.39% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
GILD wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. GILD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
GILD (8.8/10) scores 2.0 points higher than ABT (6.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
GILD shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
GILD's yield is 1.12% below its 5y average, versus 0.57% for ABT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
GILD is less volatile (beta 0.40 vs 0.59)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($183.3B vs $158.6B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ABT or GILD?
GILD wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ABT vs GILD: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABT yields 2.39% and GILD yields 2.57%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $18 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABT or GILD a safer dividend in 2026?
ABT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. GILD scores 8.8/10 (Strong). GILD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABT or GILD?
GILD's yield is 1.12% below its 5y average, versus 0.57% for ABT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABT vs GILD: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABT vs GILD data updates.
Already own ABT or GILD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding GILD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →