Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABEV vs WMT
Ambev S.A. - ADR versus Walmart Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ABEV and WMT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Neither ABEV nor WMT wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. ABEV and WMT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
On yield alone, ABEV generates 4.73% vs 0.94% — a 3.79% difference that translates to $3,790 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, WMT scores 8.8/10 (Strong) vs 6.8/10 (Solid) for ABEV — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABEV | WMT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.73% | 0.94% | ABEV wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | WMT wins |
| Growth trend | -0.19% vs 5y | -0.32% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.23 | 0.59 | ABEV wins |
| Scale | $50.9B | $838.8B | WMT wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
ABEV wins on yield (4.73% vs 0.94%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $379 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ABEV's higher yield (4.73%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus WMT's 0.94% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
WMT wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. WMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
WMT (8.8/10) scores 2.0 points higher than ABEV (6.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
ABEV is less volatile (beta 0.23 vs 0.59)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
WMT is 16.5× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ABEV or WMT?
ABEV and WMT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
ABEV vs WMT: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABEV yields 4.73% and WMT yields 0.94%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $379 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABEV or WMT a safer dividend in 2026?
ABEV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WMT scores 8.8/10 (Strong). WMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABEV or WMT?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
ABEV vs WMT: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABEV vs WMT data updates.
Already own ABEV or WMT? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →