Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABEV vs PEP
Ambev S.A. ADR versus PepsiCo, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ABEV wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PEP can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ABEV or PEP — which is better?
ABEV wins this comparison 4–1 across 6 dimensions. ABEV yields 4.73% — higher than PEP's 4.43% — and carries a 6.8/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 5.6/10 for PEP (Mixed). ABEV wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PEP can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, ABEV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) vs 5.6/10 (Mixed) for PEP — ABEV has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, ABEV's 4.73% vs 4.43% represents a $300 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABEV | PEP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.73% | 4.43% | ABEV wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 5.6/10 | ABEV wins |
| Growth trend | -0.19% vs 5y | +1.39% vs 5y | ABEV wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.23 | 0.36 | ABEV wins |
| Scale | $50.9B | $180.7B | PEP wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 4 wins | 1 wins | ABEV wins |
Dimension by dimension
ABEV wins on yield (4.73% vs 4.43%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $30 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ABEV's higher yield (4.73%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PEP's 4.43% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
ABEV wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.6/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. ABEV scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
ABEV (6.8/10) scores 1.2 points higher than PEP (5.6/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
ABEV shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ABEV's yield is 0.19% below its 5y average, versus 1.39% for PEP. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABEV is less volatile (beta 0.23 vs 0.36)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
PEP is 3.5× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are ABEV dividends qualified and are PEP dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
ABEV or PEP — which is better?
ABEV is better on our scoring, winning 4–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. ABEV wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PEP can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, ABEV or PEP?
ABEV wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PEP can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ABEV vs PEP: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABEV yields 4.73% and PEP yields 4.43%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $30 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABEV or PEP a safer dividend in 2026?
ABEV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PEP scores 5.6/10 (Mixed). ABEV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABEV or PEP?
ABEV's yield is 0.19% below its 5y average, versus 1.39% for PEP. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABEV vs PEP: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABEV vs PEP data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put ABEV and PEP into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding ABEV diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.