Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABEV vs KO
Ambev S.A. - ADR versus The Coca-Cola Company — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABEV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
KO wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. KO yields 2.42% — lower than ABEV's 4.73% — and carries a 8.0/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 6.8/10 for ABEV (Solid). KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABEV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, ABEV generates 4.73% vs 2.42% — a 2.31% difference that translates to $2,310 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, KO scores 8.0/10 (Strong) vs 6.8/10 (Solid) for ABEV — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABEV | KO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.73% | 2.42% | ABEV wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 8.0/10 | KO wins |
| Growth trend | -0.19% vs 5y | -0.44% vs 5y | KO wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.23 | 0.34 | ABEV wins |
| Scale | $50.9B | $377.9B | KO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | KO wins |
Dimension by dimension
ABEV wins on yield (4.73% vs 2.42%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $231 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ABEV's higher yield (4.73%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus KO's 2.42% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
KO wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 6.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. KO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
KO (8.0/10) scores 1.2 points higher than ABEV (6.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
KO shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
KO's yield is 0.44% below its 5y average, versus 0.19% for ABEV. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABEV is less volatile (beta 0.23 vs 0.34)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
KO is 7.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ABEV or KO?
KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ABEV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ABEV vs KO: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABEV yields 4.73% and KO yields 2.42%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $231 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABEV or KO a safer dividend in 2026?
ABEV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. KO scores 8.0/10 (Strong). KO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABEV or KO?
KO's yield is 0.44% below its 5y average, versus 0.19% for ABEV. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABEV vs KO: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABEV vs KO data updates.
Already own ABEV or KO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding KO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →