Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABBV vs MDT
Abbvie Inc versus Medtronic plc — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ABBV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but MDT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABBV | MDT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.67% | 3.51% | MDT wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.0/10 | 6.8/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -0.93% vs 5y | +0.48% vs 5y | ABBV wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.28 | 0.58 | ABBV wins |
| Scale | $453.9B | $106.5B | ABBV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 1 wins | ABBV wins |
Dimension by dimension
MDT wins on yield (3.51% vs 2.67%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $84 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
MDT's higher yield (3.51%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ABBV's 2.67% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.0/10 vs 6.8/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
ABBV shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ABBV's yield is 0.93% below its 5y average, versus 0.48% for MDT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABBV is less volatile (beta 0.28 vs 0.58)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
ABBV is 4.3× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ABBV or MDT?
ABBV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but MDT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ABBV vs MDT: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABBV yields 2.67% and MDT yields 3.51%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $84 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABBV or MDT a safer dividend in 2026?
ABBV scores 7.0/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MDT scores 6.8/10 (Solid). ABBV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABBV or MDT?
ABBV's yield is 0.93% below its 5y average, versus 0.48% for MDT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABBV vs MDT: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABBV vs MDT data updates.
Already own ABBV or MDT? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding ABBV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →