Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ABBV vs BMY
Abbvie Inc versus Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ABBV and BMY are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Neither ABBV nor BMY wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. ABBV and BMY are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
On yield alone, BMY generates 3.90% vs 2.76% — a 1.14% difference that translates to $1,140 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, BMY scores 8.3/10 (Strong) vs 7.0/10 (Solid) for ABBV — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ABBV | BMY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.76% | 3.90% | BMY wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.0/10 | 8.3/10 | BMY wins |
| Growth trend | -0.84% vs 5y | -0.06% vs 5y | ABBV wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.28 | 0.23 | Tie |
| Scale | $445.4B | $131.6B | ABBV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
BMY wins on yield (3.90% vs 2.76%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $114 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
BMY's higher yield (3.90%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ABBV's 2.76% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
BMY wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 7.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. BMY scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
BMY (8.3/10) scores 1.3 points higher than ABBV (7.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
ABBV shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ABBV's yield is 0.84% below its 5y average, versus 0.06% for BMY. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
ABBV is 3.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ABBV or BMY?
ABBV and BMY are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
ABBV vs BMY: which has a higher dividend yield?
ABBV yields 2.76% and BMY yields 3.90%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $114 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ABBV or BMY a safer dividend in 2026?
ABBV scores 7.0/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. BMY scores 8.3/10 (Strong). BMY is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ABBV or BMY?
ABBV's yield is 0.84% below its 5y average, versus 0.06% for BMY. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ABBV vs BMY: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ABBV vs BMY data updates.
Already own ABBV or BMY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →